<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re Never as Smart as You Think You Are</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/04/19/youre-never-as-smart-as-you-think-you-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/04/19/youre-never-as-smart-as-you-think-you-are/</link>
	<description>coding in the rain</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/04/19/youre-never-as-smart-as-you-think-you-are/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/04/19/youre-never-as-smart-as-you-think-you-are/#comment-738</guid>
		<description>In my experience, PostgreSQL does a pretty good job of rearranging queries -- it's quite rare (and the query has to be very complex) for a manual rearrangement to have any effect on the query plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, PostgreSQL does a pretty good job of rearranging queries &#8212; it&#8217;s quite rare (and the query has to be very complex) for a manual rearrangement to have any effect on the query plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
