Comments on: Macworld 2007: Reactions http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/01/09/macworld-2007-reactions/ coding in the rain Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:25:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Andrew http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/01/09/macworld-2007-reactions/#comment-304 Andrew Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:13:23 +0000 http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/01/09/macworld-2007-reactions/#comment-304 Good point - I didn't think about the drive sharing. However, using USB 2.0 already limits the available drive bandwidth. It would be even cooler if it had built-in iTunes sharing so I could put my very large and growing library onto a huge USB 2.0 drive and not even involve any other Mac's in the sharing. Good point - I didn’t think about the drive sharing. However, using USB 2.0 already limits the available drive bandwidth.

It would be even cooler if it had built-in iTunes sharing so I could put my very large and growing library onto a huge USB 2.0 drive and not even involve any other Mac’s in the sharing.

]]> By: 23 http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/01/09/macworld-2007-reactions/#comment-294 23 Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:58:05 +0000 http://ascarter.net/blog/2007/01/09/macworld-2007-reactions/#comment-294 Its true that gigabit outruns the broadband and WIFI connections and you can run your own gigabit switch. Still, given that you can attach drives for networked storage, it would be nice to have the faster throughput for the wired devices sharing the storage on the network. Nonetheless, its looking pretty damn appealing when I consider upgrading the home network. Its true that gigabit outruns the broadband and WIFI connections and you can run your own gigabit switch. Still, given that you can attach drives for networked storage, it would be nice to have the faster throughput for the wired devices sharing the storage on the network.

Nonetheless, its looking pretty damn appealing when I consider upgrading the home network.

]]>