<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The REST Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/10/03/the-rest-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/10/03/the-rest-way/</link>
	<description>coding in the rain</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Fan</title>
		<link>http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/10/03/the-rest-way/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/10/03/the-rest-way/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>One reason REST is wrong is the same way TDD (Test Driven Development) is wrong and the same way ActiveRecord is wrong.  Any sort of model based on simplicity and convention-over-configuration breaks when someone tries to do "complicated" things with it.

I don't think that's a bad thing -- I think simplicity is a feature in itself (would you rather implement 10 simple features or 1 complex feature?  And which would you rather maintain?), and anything that encourages it can be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason REST is wrong is the same way TDD (Test Driven Development) is wrong and the same way ActiveRecord is wrong.  Any sort of model based on simplicity and convention-over-configuration breaks when someone tries to do &#8220;complicated&#8221; things with it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a bad thing &#8212; I think simplicity is a feature in itself (would you rather implement 10 simple features or 1 complex feature?  And which would you rather maintain?), and anything that encourages it can be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
