<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reverse Switchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/06/19/reverse-switchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/06/19/reverse-switchers/</link>
	<description>coding in the rain</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/06/19/reverse-switchers/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 05:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascarter.net/blog/2006/06/19/reverse-switchers/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>While you are correct in saying that they can get lots of open source software for OS X, the point I think you miss is that many of these reverse switches have decided that it doesn't make sense to subsidize a proprietary software company by purchasing their OS. What's the point of buying a proprietary OS to run a bunch of open source software. At some point it seems you have to say "What am I doing, it's time to go Open Source all the way around."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you are correct in saying that they can get lots of open source software for OS X, the point I think you miss is that many of these reverse switches have decided that it doesn&#8217;t make sense to subsidize a proprietary software company by purchasing their OS. What&#8217;s the point of buying a proprietary OS to run a bunch of open source software. At some point it seems you have to say &#8220;What am I doing, it&#8217;s time to go Open Source all the way around.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
